A Disappointing Budget Request
Governor Fallin proposed a budget for the state this week. It included supplemental funding for education, as well as a slight increase for education for Fiscal Year 2014. Unfortunately, her proposals neither come close to what Superintendent Barresi has requested nor what is actually needed.
Supplemental Budget
Barresi requested: $37.7 million to be added to the current school year budget. This would offset shortfalls in several key line items –
- $15 million for ACE Remediation
- $6.5 million for Reading Sufficiency
- $8.5 million for health benefits
- $5.9 million for the school funding formula
- $1.8 million for the Student Longitudinal Data System
Fallin proposed: $8.5 million – just enough to cover benefits
What is needed: At least $37.7 million – Making up for the benefits gap is a no-brainer. But school districts are operating under mandates that have not been funded. Some of these mandates – ACE (high school graduation) and RSA (3rd grade retention) directly affect students. Failing to fund these programs is a huge mistake.
Next Year’s Budget
Barresi requested: $289 million in funding for FY14 over FY13, an increase of 12.4 percent. This included increased support for several line items –
- $234.7 million for financial support of public schools (money directly going into the funding formula)
- $2.1 million for instructional materials
- $2.3 million for adult education programs
- $1.5 million for alternative education
- $2.2 million for Education Leadership Oklahoma (National Board scholarships and bonuses)
- $23.6 million for health benefits
- $1 million for Oklahoma Parents as Teachers
- $13.5 million for reform implementation
- $1.5 million for competitive grants for schools
- $1.6 million for agency operations
- $5 million for testing
Fallin proposed; $13.5 million for reform implementation. This represents an increase of 0.2 percent over last year’s education budget. As CCOSA has pointed out, Fallin requested increases of 6.2 percent for Commerce and Tourism and 4.4 percent for Human Services. She is also proposing another tax cut.
What is needed: Barresi’s request is a good start. It prioritizes funding schools’ functions at a level that was in place a few years ago. While the increase in the cost of testing is disconcerting and the cost of implementing some of her reforms is understated, it is critical that schools get the basic support that they need to provide services to the students they serve. Teachers deserve raises. Schools should have up-to-date textbooks and technology. Site-based professional development should be reinstated. Districts should be able to reserve their bond funds for capital improvements and transportation needs, rather than subsuming other operational costs into those proposals.
While I don’t agree with everything Barresi is asking for, I will give her credit for trying to pay for the work that schools do. I wish I could give Fallin that much credit right now. Hopefully the legislature will be more responsive to the needs of Oklahoma’s students and schools.
As of one minute ago
- 854,130 informed readers and counting!
Follow okeducationtruths on Twitter
My TweetsRecent Posts
- Reason #1 to pick Dr. Grace over Mr. Walters: The future we’ve already seen
- Reason #2 to pick Dr. Grace over Mr. Walters: The why and the how
- Reason #3 to pick Dr. Grace over Mr. Walters: Bibliophilia
- Reason #4 to pick Dr. Grace over Mr. Walters: Respect for the profession
- Reason #5 to pick Dr. Grace over Mr. Walters: Fiscal management
Archives
- August 2022 (10)
- July 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (1)
- April 2021 (4)
- March 2021 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (3)
- November 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (5)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (10)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (6)
- September 2016 (5)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (5)
- June 2016 (15)
- May 2016 (11)
- April 2016 (11)
- March 2016 (19)
- February 2016 (13)
- January 2016 (14)
- December 2015 (13)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (2)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (8)
- April 2015 (5)
- March 2015 (11)
- February 2015 (8)
- January 2015 (8)
- December 2014 (7)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (5)
- September 2014 (7)
- August 2014 (8)
- July 2014 (10)
- June 2014 (35)
- May 2014 (15)
- April 2014 (23)
- March 2014 (15)
- February 2014 (15)
- January 2014 (13)
- December 2013 (11)
- November 2013 (19)
- October 2013 (22)
- September 2013 (10)
- August 2013 (13)
- July 2013 (15)
- June 2013 (10)
- May 2013 (24)
- April 2013 (21)
- March 2013 (22)
- February 2013 (24)
- January 2013 (24)
- December 2012 (11)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (37)
- September 2012 (19)
- August 2012 (13)
- July 2012 (14)
- June 2012 (20)
- May 2012 (15)
- April 2012 (3)
The fact that she is asking for half a million dollars to fund outsourcing jobs to the K-20 center that the SDE staff already do shows she hasn’t a clue what she is doing.
LikeLike
Where is money for salary increases?
LikeLike
It’s simply not there. I think it’s assumed within Barresi’s budget, but without a change to the state salary scale, few are likely to see increases. It’s important to remember that because of the economy, most districts are several years behind on all kinds of projects: technology upgrades, deferred maintenance, improved security, textbook purchases. Teachers deserve raises, but they’re not likely to get them without a legislative mandate. And that would probably be unfunded anyway.
LikeLike