Home > Uncategorized > Why I’m Voting for Joe Dorman

Why I’m Voting for Joe Dorman

October 28, 2014

We are a week away from Election Day, and I’m ready for the campaigning to be finished. This is the time when close races between fundamentally good people devolve into nasty accusations and contorted truths. I’m a fan of neither of these practices. They don’t influence me in a positive way.

How I will cast my vote for governor probably comes as a surprise to no one. If you’ve followed this blog at all, you know that I don’t think Mary Fallin has been good for public education. You also should know that I’m not a single-issue voter or a straight-party voter. If I agreed with Fallin on every single issue outside of how she’s treated schools, I would have to consider supporting her.

Well I don’t support her, and truthfully, I decided that long ago – probably about the time she vetoed HB 2625, which allowed for parental input into the third-grade retention decision. In fact, she didn’t just veto the bill; she delayed sending official notification of her decision to the Legislature in an effort to out-maneuver them. In other words, she wanted the win so badly that she thought cheap stunts would circumvent the will of the people. In the end, a combined vote of 124-19. Neither chamber debated the decision. They simply took the veto notice and voted it away in a matter of minutes.

This is not a contorted truth. This is a documented accounting of how events unfolded. Similarly, in June, Fallin waited until the last possible minute before deciding to sign HB 3399, which overturned the Common Core State Standards and brought back PASS as the state’s reading and math standards. Since she was one of the main reasons Oklahoma adopted the CCSS, the decision surprised me. As recently as January, she was still defending CCSS to the rest of the country’s governors. It was also the first indication I had that her campaign viewed Joe Dorman as a legitimate threat to unseat her.

It was also at this point that I began researching whether my decision would be a vote against Fallin or a vote for Dorman. It will be both of these things. Below, I will explain why.

Funding Education Properly

Since the start of the recession in 2008, states have struggled to fund all basic services. Most have begun restoring funding to public education. Unfortunately, a recent study showed that per pupil funding in Oklahoma is still 23 percent below the 2008 level.

From the Oklahoma Policy Institute

From the Oklahoma Policy Institute

This represents the worst loss of education funding in the country. As much as the State Board of Education wants to give teachers a substantial raise, it’s not up to them. We need a governor who will work with the Legislature to make this happen.

Throughout the summer, Dorman released his education plan in phases. The first installment specifically addresses funding issues. It is a three point plan to ensure that adequate funding reaches the classroom, and it is sound and realistic. It will require the executive branch and legislative branches working together, but that also seems more likely now than at any time in the last several years. His press release at the time made his case:

Joe Dorman’s “Classrooms First” plan dedicates 100% of funds from the existing Franchise Tax to in-classroom instruction and prohibits using these resources in the general fund for any other purpose. These funds will not be subject to political games and special interest giveaways and subsidies. This plan does not raise taxes one dime, and it stops the political sleight-of-hand the politicians use to cut school funds. This plan ties the state legislature’s hands from playing politics, arbitrarily cutting our public schools’ funding and harming our kids and our economy. This is good for parents and kids, good for our business community and economy, and is a fiscally sound policy for our state.

Fallin’s main emphasis during her term has been cutting taxes. Unfortunately, most of those cuts are corporate and geared at the energy industry. While there’s no doubt that this state is reliant on the oil, gas, and electricity producers, there is a middle ground in which we can support basic governmental services like schools and roads without biting the hand that feeds us. Also, Fallin’s proposal to cut income taxes would impact most Oklahomans by dozens of dollars a year. This doesn’t change the lives of the working class, but it does contribute to the decline in support of schools.

When we say that schools have lost funding, we should be specific about the fact that that loss squarely falls upon the state. As the table below illustrates, Oklahoma has seen a gradual decline over the last 15 years of support from the state, coupled with increased reliance on support from the federal government and local revenue.

School Year % Federal Funding % State Funding % Local Funding
2012-13 12.5% 48.0% 39.6%
2011-12 13.6% 47.8% 38.6%
2010-11 17.0% 47.0% 39.0%
2009-10 17.4% 46.5% 36.1%
2008-09 13.6% 52.0% 34.5%
2007-08 11.8% 53.3% 34.9%
2003-04 12.7% 53.4% 33.9%
1998-99 9.4% 57.1% 33.5%

It is appropriate to discuss 2008 as a reference point because that’s the generally agreed upon date of the recession. As you can see, since that time, the percent of district budgets supplied by the state has fallen by 5.3% since that time. I threw two more points of reference into the table as well. First is 2004, since that’s the last year Democrats controlled the Legislature. As you can see, the state and local shares of school funding stayed pretty constant for the first four years that Republicans were in charge. Going back five more years, to 1999, we can see that the percentage of school funding from the state used to be even higher.

That changed after President Bush and Congress passed NCLB in 2001. With extra funding from the feds came extra regulations and controls. Conversely, school districts in Oklahoma now face an increasingly burdensome regulatory morass from the state, even though the state picks up far less of the bill than it used to. Keep this in mind the next time you hear teachers and administrators talk about the loss of local control during the last four years.

This happened on Fallin’s watch. The recession that began two years before she took office gets some of the blame – the funding part at least. The regulatory burden schools face now falls squarely on Fallin and outgoing State Superintendent Janet Barresi.

Standards and Assessment

Fallin and Barresi gave us Common Core, and then Fallin and the Legislature took it away. They gave us mandatory retention for third graders based upon a single test, and they reacted poorly when the Legislature modified the plan. They gave us Value Added Measurements (based on junk science) for teachers and principals. They also gave us A-F Report Cards for schools. Fallin, if you’ll recall, hinted last year that if superintendents didn’t quit complaining about that last reform in particular, she’d be less likely to support increases to education funding. Her State of the State address from February outlined her record and priorities. Below are a few education quotes from that speech:

No child should ever fail to get a world-class education because our policymakers believe success is too difficult.

That’s why we need to work relentlessly on two fronts:

First, we must continue to improve K-12 public school results.

We know that we are graduating high school seniors who aren’t ready for the workforce or college.  That has to change.

Second, we have to increase the number of Oklahomans who continue their education beyond high school, either by attending college or a career technology center. A high school diploma is not enough.

We are taking active steps to address this crisis; and it is essential we continue to move forward.

For instance, too often, we set up children for failure by sending them on to higher grades without the reading skills they need. We’ve changed course – by requiring that third graders learn to read before moving on to the fourth grade.

We’ve also implemented the A-F grading system that lets parents, students, teachers and administrators know how their school is performing.

In 2010, the Legislature voted to adopt new, higher standards in English and math, and those new Oklahoma standards will be fully implemented this year.

The new standards focus on critical thinking – the kind of skills our children need to get a job or to succeed in higher levels of education.

While we are raising standards, we aren’t telling teachers how to teach that lesson or what books to use.

Those are decisions that will always be made locally.

And here’s the pay-off: we will start graduating seniors that are truly ready for the workforce AND for college or a career technology education.

Because I don’t like to take things out of context, but I also don’t like 3,000 word blog posts, you should probably go back and read the entire speech. This was when Fallin wasn’t in campaign mode and she was expecting to coast to an easy victory. What she believes is clear. We need more testing and we need the Common Core. Without these in place, schools will continue doing their own things, and we just can’t have that.

Dorman, in contrast, understands that Oklahomans will respond better to standards that are developed locally. Here are the bullet points from his plan:

  • A Blue Ribbon Commission consisting of teachers, parents, principals, superintendents, school board members and Oklahoma education college professors will work to set new education standards. The Commission will represent Oklahoma’s different schools, regions and communities. Gifted students, special needs students, and students requiring remediation will receive assistance.
  • Once the standards are written, the Blue Ribbon Commission will hold town halls and forums across the state to hear input from citizens on the standards. The input will be used to refine and finalize the new standards.
  • The Blue Ribbon Commission will continue to meet annually to assess the standards and make any changes as needed.
  • A Superintendents Advisory Board will implement the new educational policy and develop the best ways to implement policy in individual school districts while maintaining local control.
  • The Governor will host an annual student forum consisting of high school sophomores and juniors from across the state to discuss how to improve education, how to make them more college and job ready and how to improve standards to make them more ACT ready.

He also proposes scrapping the current testing system for the ACT and its cycle of tests that are developmentally tiered for 3rd through 12th graders. While I would just like to see state testing go away, I know that’s not realistic. Instead of giving students a battery of exams that have little meaning to them and none whatsoever to those in higher education, we would be better off using exams from a national college testing company. Are the questions written to the Oklahoma standards? No, and frankly, I don’t care. Do they include science and social studies content? No, and the colleges who look at ACT scores don’t care. While a lot of the frustrated educators around the state disagree with me on some of this point, I hope they will at least consider the futility of the current testing system and the fact that it has had more than its share of unintended consequences.

The Company You Keep

Dorman seems to get his ideas on education from the people working in and attending our state’s public schools. He even hangs out with teachers. Mary Fallin, when showing education reform guru Jeb Bush around Oklahoma chose a charter school to visit. It wasn’t just any charter school, either; it was KIPP – which is a franchise of a national chain of charters.

Failin Bush

From The Oklahoman

It’s like inviting another state’s former governor to Oklahoma City for a steak and taking him to Outback instead of Cattleman’s. For all of KIPP’s accomplishments, keep in mind that they play by a different set of rules.

Oklahoma teachers voted to change the leadership in education last July. Voting Barresi out was the only smart decision they could make. Below, I have compiled average teacher salaries from before the recession to now.

School Year Average Teacher Salary with Fringe Average Years of Experience Insurance Costs
2012-13 $44,118 12.5 $5,568
2011-12 $44,145 12.6 $5,394
2010-11 $45,714 13.0 $5,394
2009-10 $43,998 12.7 $5,314
2008-09 $43,584 12.7 $4,909
2007-08 $43,275 12.7 $4,371

As you can see, teacher salary – including fringe (insurance, retirement) – has changed very little in this time. I added the Experience column because I was curious if we had more veteran teachers retiring, which would account for some of the stagnation. That really isn’t happening. Meanwhile, when you look at insurance costs, you see that teachers are bringing home less now than they were six years ago. While average compensation has grown by $843, the cost of Healthchoice has increased by $1,197 per year. If teachers have a spouse and children on their insurance plans, it’s even worse. And before we get all worked up about Obamacare, remember that the increase from 2008 to 2009 is higher than all other years combined.

For all the inherent rewards of teaching, the pay just isn’t there. In fact, it’s less than it was just a few years ago – significantly less. And this happened on Mary Fallin’s watch, while she continued with her tax cuts that neither stimulated the economy nor benefitted average working families.

There’s a reason Fallin was completely shocked when she posed with the guy wearing the “Mary Failin’” t-shirt after her sole debate against Joe Dorman. The Lost Ogle corresponded with said man, who reported,

Fallin’s aid told her that he didn’t think she “wanted to take a picture with a Mary Failing t-shirt.” She then looked at my shirt and said, “You’re being mean to me!” Her staff started rushing her through the stairway completely bypassing the elevator and she said, “I just assume everyone is going to be nice.” A man from her campaign followed my group to the elevator, took our pictures, and said, “We’ll be seeing you soon.” I laughed and proceeded to get on the elevator!

Well, governor, not everybody is going to be nice. On some level, you must understand this. Otherwise you would have debated your opponent more than once. I personally know a lot of teachers in this state who don’t feel you’ve been very nice to them. They would probably adopt the respect the office in spite of its occupant approach – as many Oklahomans also do with the President.

From TLO

From TLO

Conclusion

One of my favorite ads that currently runs is the Geico ad wherein the teenagers scurry to hide from an axe murderer and make a lot of poor decisions.

I’m not saying that educators voting for Mary Fallin would be as stupid as teens hiding behind the chainsaws. It wouldn’t even be as stupid as voting for Janet Barresi. It would just be self-defeating.

A vote for Joe Dorman, on the other hand, is a vote for better working conditions, competitive salaries, and restoring education that is geared towards our students rather than the publishers and testing companies that are bleeding us dry.

Be informed, and vote wisely.

Advertisements
  1. Bec
    October 28, 2014 at 5:40 pm

    I agree with you, once again. I made up my mind months ago that I would NEVER vote for Mary Fallin. I do have one question. You said there was not science content on the ACT. There is a section labeled “Science.” Is that not testing the science content? There are four sections: reading, English, science, and math. Or have they removed the science portion. I am just wondering.

    Like

    • October 28, 2014 at 5:43 pm

      It’s “Science Reasoning.” It’s not specifically content related to Biology, Chemistry, Physics, or any other discipline. It’s really a reading assessment that tests a student’s ability to interpret data in several forms. A knowledge of scientific inquiry helps, but so does reading comprehension.

      Like

  2. Bec
    October 28, 2014 at 5:47 pm

    When my juniors are reviewing for the ACT, I tell them to treat it as a reading test with scientific topics. I am 100% in favor of going to the ACT for two main reasons. 1. It would save this state millions of dollars. 2. Students must take the ACT regardless of state testing. Why can’t they just take one test? Oh, that would be too simple, practical, and logical!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. October 28, 2014 at 6:42 pm

    I agree! I’m supporting Joe for governor because of his commitment to public education. I’m also supporting Dr. John Cox for SS for the same reason. We need PUBLIC school advocates and leaders with a comprehensive knowledge of public schools (particularly for SS).

    Thanks for the post!

    Like

  4. jmsprincipal
    October 28, 2014 at 6:44 pm

    Very well done, my friend! Excellent synopsis with outstanding data to support your position as well. I will also be voting for a democratic candidate for Governor…for the first time in my life. I simply can no longer trust Gov Fallin to do what is right for Oklahoma’s schools, teachers, and students. I believe Joe can make a difference. His experience in the House will help him navigate his way.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Kevin Hime
    October 29, 2014 at 8:08 am

    I agree that Doorman would be a friend to education. My biggest concern right now is that we build a coalition or team to move education forward in the state of Oklahoma. The odds are strong that we will have a republican Governor and Republican veto proof House and Senate. We united the House and Senate with HB2625 last year hopefully we can continue this in 2015.

    Like

    • October 29, 2014 at 8:31 am

      I get that a coalition is important. Only recently, however, have we seen intractable politicians unwilling to work across the aisle. Fallin has actively hurt the public education cause during her term. Dorman has been a voice for teachers and has work with members of both parties. If he were to win next week, that would continue.

      Like

  6. Skeptical Teacher
    October 29, 2014 at 5:23 pm

    What you mean is that you are voting for him because he’s a Democrat, right? And everybody knows that Democrats are the friends of public education. After all, look at how great our state education system was for all those decades when Democrats ruled Oklahoma.

    Like

    • October 29, 2014 at 7:06 pm

      Him being a Democrat has nothing to do with why I’m voting for him. I typically have individuals from both parties selected on my ballot.

      I see your point about Oklahoma being near the bottom in education funding prior to 2004, however. And I’ve mentioned it on the blog before.

      Like

    • Shannanigans
      October 30, 2014 at 12:45 pm

      He’s a Democrat, but if you give this some thought, he’s not very good at it. He’s not remotely liberal, but I feel like we need a leader who will reach across party lines. Fallin’s administration has been incredibly divisive and deliberately partisan. The bottom line is, her policies haven’t done education any favors…in fact, she and Barresi have dug a deep hole in a short amount of time and we need someone who will work to get these kids (and teachers) out before they fall any further.

      Like

  7. Carl
    October 29, 2014 at 9:09 pm

    Typical single issue griping about education again, the economy has been healthier in Oklahoma than ever before under Falin. I agree the state of Oklahoma needs better educational help but don’t think for one second that dorman is going to be your god send. Dorman is just the yes man for Obama here in Oklahoma. Remember Obama promised every one this and that and then got elected and lied his ass off in your faces and you seriously want more of his czars. Dorman hasn’t proved any thing here in Oklahoma you people with this one issue geeez I would have expected more from college educated people but hey you’ve been enjoying the fruits of a great economy the past 4 years and not one word of this blog was about any thing other than poor education. Hey there are some real dumb lazy education administrators out there as well that hold the education system back by their inept lack of capabilities to monitor their own teachers. When these kids sit in class and are attention challenged and curse the teachers and disrespect the teachers and principals and use their cell phones while taking test that is just a poor lack of respect because the teachers are scared or to lazy to demand those students respect what that teacher is there for and that is to teach. Yes teacher pay us very low but duh ! You knew that going into the job. Dorman has no accomplishments that has changed the face of Oklahoma hey guess what I am going to give 50% more pay raises to teachers if you’ll elect me. How about that ? So now are you going to vote for me just because I glamoured up a thought ? Just look back at your last democratic governor who lied to you about the lottery and hey if dorman gets elected get ready for obamacare to be crammed down your throats and his raising taxes on small businesses and he will stab the NRA in the back and want gun control. Just think about that people.

    Like

    • October 29, 2014 at 10:40 pm

      I don’t know what my favorite part of this was. It could be the misspelling of Fallin. Or the use of “you people.” That part reminded me of Ann Romney. You also managed to drop an Obama reference and try to scare gun owners. This makes me want to go back to the month of June and re-visit the writing test debacle.

      Dorman has done more than you are willing to admit, and Fallin has done less. You’re right that no teachers are in it to get rich, but no raises for 7 years is a bit much to ask.

      Most importantly, thanks for reading!

      And go Joe!

      Like

      • Shannanigans
        October 30, 2014 at 12:48 pm

        Oustanding entertainment. Agreed. 🙂

        Like

  8. Shelly
    October 30, 2014 at 9:22 am

    Joe Dorman can’t raise taxes on small businesses. It takes 3/4 of the Legislature to do that and Joe is against raising taxes anyway. Joe also has a higher rating from the NRA than Mary Fallin does. Even the Daily Oklahoman consistently wrote favorably about Joe’s bipartisanship and ideas….before he announced he was running for governor. In any other state, Joe’s views and record would line up very well with that of moderate Republicans. Comparing him to He Who Must Not Be Named at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. is a complete joke. Go Joe!

    Liked by 1 person

  1. November 2, 2014 at 4:05 pm
  2. November 3, 2014 at 8:43 pm
  3. December 28, 2014 at 10:18 pm
Comments are closed.
%d bloggers like this: